Appeal Board Outcome Form
After reviewing the full appeal, please complete the form below.
General Information
Enable additional features by logging in.
Board Member Names:
Learn more
faculty, staff, and student
Title:
Phone Number:
Your email address:
Email address must be of a valid format.
Your address:
Urgency of this report
(Required)
:
Please Choose...
University Appeal Board
Administrative Appeal Board
This field is required.
Time of incident:
Specific location:
Involved Parties
Involved party 1
Student Name
Student ID Number
Questions
Grounds upon which the student appealed (check all that apply)
(Required)
1. A procedural irregularity under the University policy or procedures that affected the hearing outcome.
2. New evidence that was not reasonably available through the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the hearing or dismissal of the Formal Complaint that could affect the outcome of the matter.
3. The Title IX Coordinator, Investigator(s), or Decision Maker(s) had a conflict of interest or bias for or against an individual party, or for or against complainants or respondents in general, that affected the outcome of the matter.
4. The Disciplinary Sanction imposed was grossly disproportionate to the violation(s).
You must make at least one selection.
Select 1st Ground for Appeal
(Required)
Please Choose...
A procedural irregularity under the University policy or procedures that affected the hearing outcome.
New evidence that was not reasonably available through the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the hearing or dismissal of the Formal Complaint that could affect the outcome of the matter.
The Title IX Coordinator, Investigator(s), or Decision Maker(s) had a conflict of interest or bias for or against an individual party, or for or against complainants or respondents in general, that affected the outcome of the matter.
The Disciplinary Sanction imposed was grossly disproportionate to the violation(s).
This field is required.
What is the Outcome of the 1st Ground
(Required)
Appeal Denied
Appeal Granted
This field is required.
Please articulate a rationale that includes the details and information that led the Board to this outcome?
(Required)
This field is required.
Select 2nd Grounds for Appeal
Please Choose...
A procedural irregularity under the University policy or procedures that affected the hearing outcome.
New evidence that was not reasonably available through the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the hearing or dismissal of the Formal Complaint that could affect the outcome of the matter.
The Title IX Coordinator, Investigator(s), or Decision Maker(s) had a conflict of interest or bias for or against an individual party, or for or against complainants or respondents in general, that affected the outcome of the matter.
The Disciplinary Sanction imposed was grossly disproportionate to the violation(s).
This field is required.
What is the Outcome of the 2nd Ground
Appeal Denied
Appeal Granted
This field is required.
Please articulate a rationale that includes the details and information that led the Board to this outcome?
This field is required.
Select 3rd Grounds for Appeal
Please Choose...
A procedural irregularity under the University policy or procedures that affected the hearing outcome.
New evidence that was not reasonably available through the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the hearing or dismissal of the Formal Complaint that could affect the outcome of the matter.
The Title IX Coordinator, Investigator(s), or Decision Maker(s) had a conflict of interest or bias for or against an individual party, or for or against complainants or respondents in general, that affected the outcome of the matter.
The Disciplinary Sanction imposed was grossly disproportionate to the violation(s).
This field is required.
What is the Outcome of the 3rd Ground
Appeal Denied
Appeal Granted
This field is required.
Please articulate a rationale that includes the details and information that led the Board to this outcome?
This field is required.
Select 4th Grounds for Appeal
Please Choose...
A procedural irregularity under the University policy or procedures that affected the hearing outcome.
New evidence that was not reasonably available through the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the hearing or dismissal of the Formal Complaint that could affect the outcome of the matter.
The Title IX Coordinator, Investigator(s), or Decision Maker(s) had a conflict of interest or bias for or against an individual party, or for or against complainants or respondents in general, that affected the outcome of the matter.
The Disciplinary Sanction imposed was grossly disproportionate to the violation(s).
This field is required.
What is the Outcome of the 4th Ground
Appeal Denied
Appeal Granted
This field is required.
Please articulate a rationale that includes the details and information that led the Board to this outcome?
This field is required.
What outcome did the Board determine?
(Required)
Uphold the finding
In the case of new information, remand back to original board
Order a new hearing (Process flaw)
Modify the sanctions
Retract sanction(s)
This field is required.
If selecting to modify the sanctions, please articulate those modifications below.
This field is required.
Submission
